Peel Region’s policy whiplash wasn’t just another headline; it was a gut punch for anyone who believes public service should mean listening first and acting with care. For Ontario Liberals, and for every senior who’s watched the long-term care crisis deepen, Peel’s reversal is more than a local spat. It’s a warning.
When governments lurch from one decision to another, trust gets shredded. Peel Region’s near-dissolution, announced and then scrapped, exposed a pattern: policy made with little public consultation, only to be walked back after expert and community backlash. If that sounds familiar, it should. Ontario’s Auditor General just confirmed what many have felt for years: this government is making up policy on the fly, and the people most affected are rarely at the table.
The Liberal Party has voiced these concerns for months. Bonnie Crombie, now Liberal leader, called the Ford government’s approach “deliberately” neglectful, especially in health care and long-term care. Ontario’s seniors and their families have paid the price: longer wait times, shuttered emergency rooms, and a patchwork of agency nurses filling gaps left by underfunding and poor planning. The Peel saga isn’t just about municipal boundaries; it’s about whether Ontarians believe anyone is actually listening to their needs.
Here’s what Peel teaches us. The drive to dissolve the region was sold as a way to cut costs and boost efficiency. But as Municipal Affairs Minister Paul Calandra admitted, it took expert intervention and a transition board to reveal that the plan would do the opposite. It’s tempting for leaders to promise big changes quickly, but when you sidestep consultation, you end up with more confusion, higher costs, and lost faith.
Let’s be blunt: this isn’t just about Conservatives making mistakes. It’s about a system that too often treats public input as a box to tick, not a foundation to build on. The Auditor General’s latest report found a “consistent lack of consultation” across ministries, from health care to housing and energy. In long-term care, that failure hits hardest. Seniors waiting for beds, families desperate for answers, workers stretched to exhaustion. The report’s numbers are stark: over 200 unplanned ER closures in a year, wait times climbing, and in Northern Ontario, the use of agency nurses is 25 times higher than the provincial average.
Imagine a family in Thunder Bay, watching their hospital’s emergency room close for the third time in six months. Or a senior in Peel, caught in the crossfire of political games while their care gets more expensive and less reliable. These aren’t hypotheticals; they’re the reality of what happens when public consultation is sidelined.
Some argue that consultation slows things down, or that big decisions need to be made quickly. But speed isn’t a substitute for substance. The cost of getting it wrong, lost trust, wasted money, and real harm to people always outweighs the cost of listening.
So what now? For Ontario Liberals, the Peel precedent is a call to lead differently. Real reform in long-term care starts with honest, grassroots engagement. Not just town halls after the fact, but sustained conversations with seniors, families, nurses, and local teams. It means supporting local riding associations, prioritizing transparency, and putting the needs of working people and families at the centre of every policy. Success isn’t measured in headlines or quick wins; it’s in whether seniors feel safer, families feel heard, and communities feel stronger.
Peel’s reversal hurt. But it also opened the door to do things better. Public service is about showing up, doing the work, and standing with people even when it’s messy. Ontario can build a long-term care system that works for everyone, but only if we start by listening. That’s what real leadership looks like.
If you haven't yet signed up for our OLSC bi-weekly newsletter, SUBSCRIBE or better yet, help other seniors as a VOLUNTEER.