Blaming climate rules for lost jobs is easy politics. Facing the real fight over tariffs – who pays them, who profits from them, and who is protected by them – takes courage.

Canada is once again rolling out counter tariffs in response to new American levies, while scrambling to shore up sectors like Northern Alberta’s forestry industry that are taking the hit. At the same time, Ottawa is investing in agrifood automation, Ontario is eyeing a nuclear build near Sarnia, and older adults are begging for age friendly housing instead of more institutional long-term care. These are not separate files. They are one story about what kind of transition economy this country chooses to build.

Tariffs are often framed as punishment. They should be treated as tools. When the government imposes counter tariffs on imported goods, it is making a choice about revenue and bargaining power. That choice can either prop up the status quo or bankroll a just transition – into green industry, into safer work for autoworkers and forestry workers, and into a long overdue shift away from warehousing elders in institutions.

Older adults have been clear. Ninety-six per cent want to age in place or at least in their home communities, with supports wrapped around them. Denmark stopped building traditional institutions decades ago by investing in community care and supported housing. Ontario, by contrast, has poured billions into long-term care beds many people fear, while age friendly assisted living and small neighbourhood homes struggle for funding.

A serious transition strategy would connect these dots. If tariffs are hitting pulp mills, tariff revenue and matching investments should help those communities move into low-carbon wood products, clean energy, and retrofits of local housing into accessible, assisted living. When government backs new nuclear capacity, it should insist that supply chains and jobs are anchored in regions where autoworkers and tradespeople are facing disruption, with training pathways that work for mid-career workers, not just twenty-year-olds.

This is the non-obvious opportunity: use counter tariffs not only to answer Washington, but to answer the seniors in Halton, Kenora, Guelph and beyond who are saying they do not want to die in institutions. Every tariff package should be judged by a simple test: does this move us toward a green, age friendly transition economy, or not?

That means tying tariff policy to concrete plans for community-based assisted living, small fully staffed homes, and wellness hubs in naturally occurring retirement communities. It means backing green industry that keeps younger workers in their hometowns so they can actually care for aging parents. Tariffs will always be part of trade fights. The choice now is whether they also become part of the solution for working people and elders who have already done their share.

If you haven't yet signed up for our OLSC bi-weekly newsletter, SUBSCRIBE or better yet, help other seniors as a VOLUNTEER.

This article was created using research from the cited references below, a human editor and an AI-assisted workflow.

References:
Team Carney front benchers fan out to unveil new support for Alberta forestry sector, B.C. seniors
Ontario government takes next step towards possible Nuclear Plant on America’s doorstep